Friday, November 23, 2007
Indian Art
On our way home from our last day of school, Melissa and I noticed some beautiful Indian art on a wall in Footscray. I don't remember much about it now, just that it was very inspiring. If your ever back in Footscray, I encourage you all to take a look. It's on the corner of Gordon St. and Barkley St.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Ketchup in your curry
I know the viewing was sometime ago, but I just wanted to say that the documentary that Effy screened "Ketchup in your curry" really aggrivated me at times. That patriotic Indian man who was furious over the introduction of KFC in India annoyed me so much. I understand that it wasn't so much the KFC, but the Western ideas that it represented that irritated him. What's wrong with a little Western spice in Indian culture. We in Australia (most of us anyway) embrace the Eastern cultures and love getting involved. Just have a look at Chinatown. I think that the Indians need to lighten up a little bit.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Monday, October 22, 2007
Indian Film Festival
The Indian Film Festival is currently underway at the Nova Cinema. It runs for a few more days. Interested? To see the program, try http://www.cinemanova.com.au/Sunday, October 7, 2007
The Conference.
I attended only the second session, which was enough for me.
Robin Jeffries was excellent, very informative and interesting - made me want to visit commie Kerala immediately!
Maxine(?) was pretty ordinary - too waffley.
Mugdha's would have been good, if she could have mastered the technology and shown us the video of Indian news shows.
Hari was like some midnight to dawn DJ - a real smoothy - all style and no content.
Lunch was good - managed to drop a chickpea on my trousers - jeez that curry stains!
I attended only the second session, which was enough for me.
Robin Jeffries was excellent, very informative and interesting - made me want to visit commie Kerala immediately!
Maxine(?) was pretty ordinary - too waffley.
Mugdha's would have been good, if she could have mastered the technology and shown us the video of Indian news shows.
Hari was like some midnight to dawn DJ - a real smoothy - all style and no content.
Lunch was good - managed to drop a chickpea on my trousers - jeez that curry stains!
The Making of Mahatma
I thought the film, as a film, was a bit of a stinker. I found the content interesting, insofar as it dealt in great detail with Gandhi's early life in Africa. The insight I gained into Gandhi, the person, during the interval break, however, was much more interesting. I was talking to a class-mate who is of African descent, who was far from complimentary about the Indian presence in Africa. According to him, Indians migrated to Africa for the sole purpose of making money, from white colonists and black Africans alike, and showed little or no compassion for the native people, who were far more oppressed and miss-treated than Indians. The film depicts unfair treatment of the Indian community by the government through discriminatory laws pertaining to commerce. Protest against these laws was met with rough justice. Contrast this with the treatment of native Africans, hardly depicted in the film at all, who were treated like animals, without access even to rough justice.
I think this can be understood through caste. Gandhi was Vaisya (merchant) caste and when he first went to India he went to practice company law, as an advocate for the Vaisya community in South Africa. He became a champion and a leader of this community, which is not within Vaisya dharma. I speculate that it may have been seen as "OK" by him and the community, because of the special circumstance of it being a Vaisya-only community, outside of mother India. I further speculate that on his return to India, broader society there would not, and did not, accept Gandhi as a leader.
I thought the film, as a film, was a bit of a stinker. I found the content interesting, insofar as it dealt in great detail with Gandhi's early life in Africa. The insight I gained into Gandhi, the person, during the interval break, however, was much more interesting. I was talking to a class-mate who is of African descent, who was far from complimentary about the Indian presence in Africa. According to him, Indians migrated to Africa for the sole purpose of making money, from white colonists and black Africans alike, and showed little or no compassion for the native people, who were far more oppressed and miss-treated than Indians. The film depicts unfair treatment of the Indian community by the government through discriminatory laws pertaining to commerce. Protest against these laws was met with rough justice. Contrast this with the treatment of native Africans, hardly depicted in the film at all, who were treated like animals, without access even to rough justice.
I think this can be understood through caste. Gandhi was Vaisya (merchant) caste and when he first went to India he went to practice company law, as an advocate for the Vaisya community in South Africa. He became a champion and a leader of this community, which is not within Vaisya dharma. I speculate that it may have been seen as "OK" by him and the community, because of the special circumstance of it being a Vaisya-only community, outside of mother India. I further speculate that on his return to India, broader society there would not, and did not, accept Gandhi as a leader.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
On the box
On Sunday night (Sept. 30) at 10.00pm. ABC, Compass is airing an interview with writer and novelist William Dalrymple. His latest book is The Last Mughal:The fall of a Dynasty, Delhi, 1857.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)